Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Panama

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,673,496 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.963. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 82.6 Chinese.
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $77,465, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.8%), and median household income ($80,873 compared to $98,496, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $41,461, a difference of 6.2%), median earnings ($45,198 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,853
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,647
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,873
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,198
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,962
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,278
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,451
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,815
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,944
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 58.4%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 54.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.2%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.8%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.6%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.86%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.6%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.1%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.2%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PanamaChinese
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%