Cherokee vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Chinese
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,273,890 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 133.9 Chinese.
![Cherokee Integration in Chinese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-community-integration.webp)
Cherokee vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.1%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $98,496, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $116,156, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $56,872, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $48,836, a difference of 18.4%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Average 25.9% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 66.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.6%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 66.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.0%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.3%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Cherokee vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.9%).
![Cherokee vs Chinese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-chinese/cherokee-vs-chinese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |