Alsatian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,117,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 333.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $58,162, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $98,496, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,284 compared to $46,098, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.7%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%), married-couple households (44.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.6%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.53%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%).