Immigrants from China vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,097,871 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $44,014, a difference of 23.3%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $56,136, a difference of 20.0%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $48,040, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,470, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,201, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.4%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 99.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.6%).