Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Chinese
5,545
SOCIAL INDEX
53.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
174th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Southern Europe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,539,249 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 43.8 Chinese.
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $116,156, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($91,605 compared to $98,496, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,027 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,614 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,605 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,280 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,217 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,275 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,484 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,486 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,775 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,902 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 33.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Fair 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |