Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Northern Africa
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,740,443 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $99,232, a difference of 20.7%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $90,026, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $46,531, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,185, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,522, a difference of 10.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $46,531 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $108,161 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $90,026 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $49,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $58,008 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $42,084 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $99,232 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $105,430 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Excellent $62,522 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Good 15.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Good 16.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Fair 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 87.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 52.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 61.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 41.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |