Immigrants from China vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,013,292 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.955. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 107.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $39,163, a difference of 38.6%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $76,383, a difference of 37.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $88,446, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,330, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,713, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 70.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 60.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 95.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 45.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 52.8%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 83.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 80.0%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 102.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 80.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 16.5%).