Swedish vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swedish
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swedes
Chinese
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Swedish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,584,887 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 117.8 Chinese.
Swedish vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.5%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($88,524 compared to $98,496, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,750 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.76%), median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,750 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,499 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,524 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,851 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,445 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,421 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,986 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,136 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,377 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,736 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.4% | Average 25.9% |
Swedish vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Swedish vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 69.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Unemployment Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Swedish vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Swedish vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.91%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Swedish vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Swedish vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.9%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 39.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Fair 1.8% |
Swedish vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Disability Metric | Swedish | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |