Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Nepalese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Nepalese
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Nepalese Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,205,166 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Nepalese.
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $38,442, a difference of 41.2%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $49,458, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $94,153, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,472, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,761, a difference of 17.7%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $38,442 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $94,153 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Poor $82,410 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $43,860 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $49,458 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $38,603 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $54,472 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Poor $91,498 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $93,355 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $58,761 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 38.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.4% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Fair 29.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 33.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 80.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 30.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Poor 45.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 33.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 105.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 36.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 146.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 107.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 102.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 95.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 93.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 92.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 92.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 90.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 85.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 39.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 29.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Nepalese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 38.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 13.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Nepalese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 0.97% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 28.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |