Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Alsatian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Alsatians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alsatian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,722,480 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Alsatians.
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,059, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $85,053, a difference of 23.8%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $103,010, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,797, a difference of 11.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $47,284, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $47,284 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Average $103,010 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Average $85,053 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Good $47,023 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Good $55,380 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Good $40,060 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $49,267 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Average $95,059 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Average $100,435 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Good $61,797 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 40.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 34.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 37.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.8%), currently married (47.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.8% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Poor 45.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 87.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Average 93.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 41.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Alsatian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |