Immigrants from China vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,317,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,511, a difference of 25.4%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $37,904, a difference of 23.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $44,076, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,621, a difference of 12.3%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,493, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 38.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 93.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.7%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).