Bolivian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,699,069 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to a decrease of 11.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,526 compared to $46,098, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($61,066 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($52,005 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,506 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,871 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.3%), and median family income ($119,479 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.4%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (49.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (19.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.0%), ambulatory disability (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.6%).