Armenian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Armenian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Armenians
Chinese
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Armenian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,490,375 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Chinese.
Armenian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,002 compared to $116,156, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.98%), median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($49,804 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.0%).
Income Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,287 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,692 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,807 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,804 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,134 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,212 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,179 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,248 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,002 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,656 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Average 25.9% |
Armenian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 51.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Poverty Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
Poverty | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Armenian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Armenian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Labor Participation Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 64.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Armenian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
Family Households | Average 64.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Armenian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Armenian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Armenian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Armenian | Chinese |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.6% |