Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,305,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 20.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $116,156, a difference of 26.0%), and wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.3%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 79.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.8%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.2%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.69%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 213.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 127.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 23.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 90.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.5%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.39%), bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%).