Immigrants from China vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,466,871 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $41,017, a difference of 32.3%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,306, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,058, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $71,021, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,158, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 97.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 95.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.67%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.5%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.5%).