Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Grenada
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Grenada
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,840,164 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Grenada.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $85,552, a difference of 42.8%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $89,249, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,538, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $41,932, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $45,596, a difference of 24.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $41,123 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $89,249 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $76,517 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Fair $45,596 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $50,279 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $41,932 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $54,538 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $88,311 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $85,552 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $50,747 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 86.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 12.4% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 13.0% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 30.3% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 47.5%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 25.7% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 67.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 82.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.1%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 47.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 25.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 37.5% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 39.1% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 147.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 120.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 100.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 35.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 79.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 100.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 37.5% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 62.7% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 28.7% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 125.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 79.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.8% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.0% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 91.6% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.4% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 85.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 59.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 35.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Poor 14.0% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.4% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 0.94% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 11.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Fair 23.8% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 47.9% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Fair 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |