Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,413,262 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $56,331, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $86,425, a difference of 21.9%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $103,197, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,846, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $43,363, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $50,151, a difference of 12.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $46,929 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Average $103,197 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Good $86,425 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $50,151 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $57,941 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $43,363 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $54,846 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $98,849 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Average $100,523 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $56,331 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 49.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.49%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Poor 17.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Fair 17.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Excellent 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.6%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 29.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 82.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.33%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 76.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 51.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 73.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 37.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Excellent 61.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 50.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Excellent 2.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.2%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 0.85% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |