Basque vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Basque
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Basques
Chinese
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Basque Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,807,549 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Chinese.
Basque vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,653 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($87,001 compared to $98,496, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,387 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,086 compared to $46,098, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($55,370 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($46,399 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Basque | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,086 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,760 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $87,001 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,399 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,370 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,352 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,818 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,709 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,387 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,653 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.8% | Average 25.9% |
Basque vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.1%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.96%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.6%).
Poverty Metric | Basque | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Basque vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Basque | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Basque vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Basque | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Basque vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Basque | Chinese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Basque vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.58%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Basque | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Basque vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and associate's degree (46.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Basque | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Basque vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
Disability Metric | Basque | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |