Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Bhutanese
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,840,394 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Bhutanese.
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $109,520, a difference of 9.3%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $61,759, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $57,078, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $117,750, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.66%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 0.72%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Bhutanese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |