Thai vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,542,564 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $56,872, a difference of 26.8%), median earnings ($59,237 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.3%), and per capita income ($54,307 compared to $46,098, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $58,162, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $77,465, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $116,156, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.5%), receiving food stamps (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and single mother poverty (24.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.9%), family households with children (30.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.0%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.5%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.7%), and male disability (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.91%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.3%).