Immigrants from China vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,933,092 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $74,847, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $67,715, a difference of 55.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $78,960, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,371, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $51,949, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 78.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 71.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 43.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 52.2%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 94.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 129.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 117.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 101.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 94.1%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 74.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.7%).