Immigrants from China vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,272,729 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $93,373, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $90,966, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,210, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,973, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $56,351, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 74.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.2%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 93.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 59.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 123.7%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 79.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.3%).