Immigrants from China vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,130,971 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.715% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 715.2 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $94,423, a difference of 26.8%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,010, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $100,962, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,201, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,656, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 35.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.2%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.1%).