Immigrants from China vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,252,389 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,195, a difference of 20.1%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $39,159, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $101,936, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,108, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $110,201, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $65,329, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 47.1%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 117.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 86.9%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.8%).