Immigrants from China vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,371,862 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 41.7 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $33,279, a difference of 63.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $75,647, a difference of 58.3%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $67,879, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,704, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $52,081, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 87.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 81.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 85.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 64.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 74.2%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 133.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 127.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 113.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 101.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 76.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.4%).