Immigrants from China vs Jamaican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,944,361 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Jamaicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $83,933, a difference of 42.7%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $90,581, a difference of 38.6%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $48,632, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,929, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $38,670, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $54,560, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 71.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 62.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 112.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 80.7%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.5%).