Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,010,965 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $101,124, a difference of 18.4%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $46,938, a difference of 15.6%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $91,887, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,521, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $108,471, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 79.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.1%).