Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,588,106 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $104,713, a difference of 14.4%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $94,222, a difference of 11.8%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $113,434, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,522, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,462, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.9%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.66%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.2%).