Guatemalan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,178,289 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.4%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $116,188, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 93.0%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 134.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.59%).