Dominican vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Dominicans

Chinese

Tragic
Exceptional
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Dominican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,230,511 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Dominican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dominicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dominicans corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Chinese.
Dominican Integration in Chinese Communities

Dominican vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,964 compared to $77,465, a difference of 64.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,623 compared to $116,156, a difference of 44.1%), and median family income ($82,888 compared to $116,188, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,046 compared to $41,461, a difference of 11.9%), median earnings ($41,864 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $58,162, a difference of 17.2%).
Dominican vs Chinese Income
Income MetricDominicanChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,697
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,888
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,302
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,864
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,204
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,046
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,633
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,229
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,623
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$46,964
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Average
25.9%

Dominican vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 127.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 120.5%), and receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 118.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and single male poverty (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.6%).
Dominican vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricDominicanChinese
Poverty
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Dominican vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (7.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 58.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.8%).
Dominican vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDominicanChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Dominican vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Dominican vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDominicanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Dominican vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 77.8%), married-couple households (38.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Dominican vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDominicanChinese
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.5%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Dominican vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 257.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 152.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 30.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 70.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.7%).
Dominican vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDominicanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
8.8%

Dominican vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 117.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Dominican vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricDominicanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.5%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Dominican vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.70%), male disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Dominican vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricDominicanChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%