Tongan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,272,399 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 28.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $77,465, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($41,693 compared to $46,098, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($105,967 compared to $116,188, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $58,162, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $104,264, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($93,076 compared to $98,496, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.0%), single father poverty (12.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.7%), family households with children (31.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (69.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%).