Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Nicaragua
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,763,646 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Nicaragua.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $38,065, a difference of 42.6%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $88,267, a difference of 42.2%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $47,482, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,266, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $36,023, a difference of 30.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $38,065 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $88,267 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $76,784 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $41,737 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $47,482 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $36,023 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $53,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $84,914 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $89,108 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $52,085 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 80.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 45.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.2%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 17.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Average 5.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 72.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Average 82.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 53.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 67.5% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 38.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Good 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Average 55.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 127.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 80.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 95.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 93.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 92.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 91.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 89.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 86.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 83.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 79.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 57.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 52.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 40.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |