Cheyenne vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,505,825 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.258% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 257.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $116,156, a difference of 52.1%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $98,496, a difference of 47.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($40,233 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 158.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 119.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (25.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.5%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 166.7%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 99.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.47 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (63.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.3%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.1%).