Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,475,236 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $82,254, a difference of 45.6%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $39,529, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $49,201, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,375, a difference of 18.5%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,916, a difference of 20.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 45.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.6%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
34.9%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%