Immigrants from China vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,734,103 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,560, a difference of 25.3%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $85,797, a difference of 22.8%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $55,415, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,270, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,247, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 20.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 30.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.4%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.9%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.1%).