Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Bahamians

Good
Tragic
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,510,010 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Bahamians.
Immigrants from China Integration in Bahamian Communities

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $75,395, a difference of 58.8%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $82,631, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $69,726, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,743, a difference of 26.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $35,125, a difference of 33.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
20.2%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 77.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
17.0%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
40.8%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.1%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaBahamian
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%