Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Bahamian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Bahamians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bahamian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,510,010 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Bahamians.
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $75,395, a difference of 58.8%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $82,631, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $69,726, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,743, a difference of 26.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $35,125, a difference of 33.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $36,427 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $82,631 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $69,726 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $39,735 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $44,756 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $35,125 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $45,743 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $75,395 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $81,369 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $51,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 77.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 82.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 41.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 40.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Poor 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Bahamian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Bahamian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |