Immigrants from China vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,543,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $49,640, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $110,064, a difference of 8.8%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $97,015, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $66,027, a difference of 4.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $114,754, a difference of 6.5%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $62,953, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.9%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%).