Immigrants from China vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,593,231 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $68,910, a difference of 73.8%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $32,012, a difference of 69.5%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $76,880, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,018, a difference of 28.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $52,930, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 124.1%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 116.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 26.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.0%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 117.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.79, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 42.2%), no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 106.1%), bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 89.6%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.36%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 81.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 76.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.2%).