Immigrants from Greece vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,290,476 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Greece communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Greece within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Greece corresponds to a decrease of 19.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,636 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.9%), per capita income ($51,891 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($62,689 compared to $56,872, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.97%), median family income ($117,344 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.99%), and median household income ($96,675 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (63.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 75.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 44.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.2%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Greece and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.8%), male disability (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.3%).