Immigrants from China vs Danish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,128,459 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Danes within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Danes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $37,730, a difference of 24.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $97,221, a difference of 23.2%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $44,095, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,041, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $63,117, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $105,619, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 43.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.8%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 130.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.0%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.3%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.2%).