Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,632,166 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,596, a difference of 25.3%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,848, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $38,306, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,654, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,586, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.43%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 40.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 116.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.4%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).