Danish vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Danish
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Danes
Chinese
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Danish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,526,674 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.135% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 134.6 Chinese.
Danish vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,117 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.7%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and median household income ($87,676 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,246 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($44,095 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($46,392 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.3%).
Income Metric | Danish | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,095 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,900 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,676 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,392 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,246 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,730 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $53,041 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,221 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,619 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,117 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 31.0% | Average 25.9% |
Danish vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Danish | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Danish vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Danish | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Danish vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.91%).
Labor Participation Metric | Danish | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Danish vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (51.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (50.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Danish | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Danish vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Danish | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danish vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.8%), associate's degree (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Danish | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Danish vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Danish | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |