Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from South Central Asia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,208,951 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.112% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 111.9 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $52,660, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $116,626, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $57,818, a difference of 0.20%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $125,956, a difference of 0.33%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $106,057, a difference of 0.69%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 9.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.0%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and family households (64.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 76.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.14%), associate's degree (55.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 6.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.72%), male disability (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |