Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Albania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,333,490 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Albania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Immigrants from Albania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $97,929, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $86,534, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $101,957, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,597, a difference of 8.1%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $42,388, a difference of 10.8%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.9%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Albania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%).