Immigrants from China vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,884,210 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $79,956, a difference of 49.8%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $36,690, a difference of 47.9%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $45,607, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,132, a difference of 15.6%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $56,768, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 46.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 173.6%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 129.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 105.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.7%).