Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Caribbean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Caribbean
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
956
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
332nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 389,228,528 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Caribbean.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,540 compared to $83,319, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $80,326, a difference of 49.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $82,513, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,757, a difference of 14.1%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $36,414, a difference of 29.0%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $37,254 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $83,319 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $71,860 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $41,119 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $46,193 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $36,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $50,757 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $80,326 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $82,513 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $48,535 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 20.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 105.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.4%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 31.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 65.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 61.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 40.8% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.33 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 39.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.9%), no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 80.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 44.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 4.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 141.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 84.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 80.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 56.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 51.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 39.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Caribbean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 24.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |