Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,527,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.4%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $58,353, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $134,818, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $56,835, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $47,986, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $124,429, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.1%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.4%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%).