Immigrants from China vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Yuman

Good
Tragic
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,865,189 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Yuman.
Immigrants from China Integration in Yuman Communities

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $72,956, a difference of 64.1%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $33,236, a difference of 63.3%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $78,055, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,933, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $53,110, a difference of 30.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
23.3%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 125.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 118.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 18.8%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
20.2%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 283.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 134.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 114.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.8%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
76.3%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 79.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.1%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.47, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
44.4%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 129.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 105.6%), and doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 101.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 8th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from China vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 93.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 81.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaYuman
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%