Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chinese
1,653
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
294th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,847,411 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.285% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 285.5 Chinese.
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.3%), wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($45,729 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.8%), and median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $56,872, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,476 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,988 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,373 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,729 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,376 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,895 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,437 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,748 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,347 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,598 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.3% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 74.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 73.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.4%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 20.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), married-couple households (41.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 199.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 78.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 24.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 79.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |