Immigrants from China vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Comanche
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,269,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Comanche.
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $82,152, a difference of 45.8%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $73,747, a difference of 42.8%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $38,088, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,518, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $54,922, a difference of 26.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 54.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 90.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Comanche |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |